’Sarcophagus and Eye of Horus ON MARS’ - Shock claims of ancient Martian civilisation

Here's a video about plants on Mars aswell?



The following story is quite literally whatever you want to believe? It must be a slow day at his office? It looks nothing like a Sarcophagus does it? It can't be!

Source of story express.co.uk
A "SARCOPGAGUS-like" object and Eye of Horus-style "carving" have allegedly been found in NASA images taken on Mars.

NOT A SARCOPHAGUS

The far-fetched claims are made by a notorious alien hunter in a series of blogs. Scott C Waring wrote on website ufosightingsdfaily.com that his discovery of the Eye of Horus "carved into a rock" on the Red Planet was "absolute proof of life". He said: "This is the Eye of Horus on Mars. The writing is clear, if you seen enough Egyptian hieroglyphs, you will know right off, this is a type of writing through drawings. "I don't imagine much will ever come of it, since few if any Egyptian archaeologists will ever see these photos.

"Each line has distinct meaning and purpose behind it. This is 100 percent evidence that intelligent life did once exist on the surface of Mars. "If life still exists, it would have to live below the surface, because daily life above the surface would be extremely hard, but not impossible." The Eye of Horus is an ancient Egyptian symbol of protection, royal power and good health, which often appeared in hieroglyphs.

Here we go again

There is a widespread theory among some alien believers Mars once had life that flourished just like on Earth, with ancient civilisations to rival our own, but that it was killed off by a catastrophic nuclear war. It ties in with the ancient aliens theory that our own civilisations like the ancient Egyptians were visited by advanced aliens from outer space thousands of years ago who helped them build remarkable monuments like the pyramids.

The images Mr Waring scours through are taken by the NASA Curiosity rover droid which roams the surface of the planet and beams back photos before they are placed online for anyone to view. In separate images taken by the rover, Mr Waring claimed to find more evidence of an ancient civilisation - a sarcophagus. He wrote today: "I also found a funeral sarcophagus in the shape of a person.

"It has similarities to ancient Egyptian sarcophaguses found." Mr Waring also claimed to find ruined buildings. With so much evidence apparently just sitting on the surface of Mars, why have we heard nothing from NASA? Mr Waring, like many fellow conspiracy theorists, has his own idea why. He added: "You know NASA. They want to keep it quiet so Russia and China will not begin to compete with them to make colonies on Mars."

NASA has a different response. Although it will not comment on individual claims, NASA says there is no evidence of even the simplest forms of life having existed on Mars. The so-called discoveries of ancient structures on Mars, it says, are simply the effects of pareidolia coupled with imagination and wishful thinking. Pareidolia is when the brain tricks the eyes into seeing familiar objects or shapes, such as animals or faces in textures or patterns, such as clouds or the surface of a rock.

Related video;

The U.N finally bloody admits role in Haiti's deadly cholera outbreak, terrible!

The UN has finally acknowledged it played a role in an outbreak of cholera in Haiti in 2010 that has since killed about 10,000 people in the country.


19 August 2016 From the section Latin America & Caribbean.

Scientific studies have shown that Nepalese UN troops were the source of the disease - but the UN repeatedly denied responsibility until now. An internal report seen by the New York Times is said to have led to the shift. But the UN still says it is protected by diplomatic immunity from claims for compensation from victims' families.

On Thursday, Farhan Haq, a spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, said that "over the past year the UN has become convinced it needs to do much more regarding its own involvement in the initial outbreak and the suffering of those affected by cholera". However, Mr Haq reiterated that the UN's legal position in on diplomatic immunity and possible compensation "has not changed".


The cholera appears to have spread after sewage from a UN base in central Haiti leaked into a nearby river.

His comments came after the confidential internal report stated that the epidemic "would not have broken out but for the actions of the United Nations," according to the New York Times newspaper. It says the report was sent to Mr Ban last week by long-time UN adviser Philip Alston, a New York University law professor who consults the world body on human rights issues. The cholera outbreak has been blamed on leaking sewage pipes at a UN base. The US courts have rejected claims for compensation filed by victims' families. No cases of the bacterial infection, which causes diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and muscle cramps, had been recorded in Haiti for a century until the outbreak in late 2010. Cholera is spread through infected faeces. Once it enters the water supply it is difficult to stop - especially in a country like Haiti which has almost no effective sewage disposal systems.

GETTY IMAGES
Source: BBC UK

CONSPIRACY LIE IS 2 WEEKS OLD TODAY!

That's all we've been going for folks, maybe a little less than that im not sure as ive not had a coffee yet? But rest assured we will be continuing our efforts and hopefully we will get more followers? We literally started from scratch with nothing but a blank template on Blogspot. We think that's pretty cool. Here's to many more weeks if not months and years? Hope so!
Bye for now, Tim.
Founder.

The First Ones

There’s a lot of potentially habitable worlds in the Universe, and yet we haven’t found any evidence of intelligent civilizations other than our own. Why is that? Lot’s of ideas have been proposed, such as the idea that aliens are being intentionally silent, or that intelligent life kills itself off in a short time. But another idea is simply that we’re the first civilization to appear.

The first ones

Someone has to be first, so why not us? It’s generally thought that the existence of intelligent life should become more likely over time. As the Universe evolves, more heavy elements are created and become available, and stellar systems with heavy elements (like our solar system) are more likely to form. Life also takes time to arise and evolve, and over time it has a greater chance of achieving the complexity necessary for intelligence. So it seems reasonable that the odds of sentient life increase with cosmic age. Of course, after trillions of years star production will have died off, and even small red dwarfs will start to cool and fade, meaning that the likelihood of life arising at that point is basically zero. So somewhere between the big bang and the ends of time there should be a period of time where intelligent life is most likely to evolve.

A new paper looks at just when this “peak sentience” might occur. In this work they formulate an equation calculating the probability for life to form on a potentially habitable planet in a particular volume of space. It’s similar to the Drake equation, and includes similar factors such as the number of stars, and the number of habitable planets, but looks at how the overall probability changes over time. All things being equal (and only assuming life similar to that on Earth) the equation predicts that life is most likely to arise about 10 trillion years from now around small red dwarfs. In the grand scheme of things, the appearance of life on Earth occurred quite early, so we might just be the first civilization to arise. All that said, there are reasons not to take this work too seriously.

Key to the conclusion is the idea that all things are equal. Specifically that potentially habitable planets around small red dwarfs are just as likely to have life than Earth-like planets around Sun-like stars. That skews the data a bit, because small red dwarfs are much, much more common than stars like our Sun. But red dwarfs are also known to have large solar flares that could seriously harm any life on a close planet, and red dwarfs are so cool that habitable worlds would need to be very close to the star. So close that they would likely be tidally locked, with one side always facing toward the star.

It’s quite likely that red dwarfs aren't very life friendly, so they really shouldn't be included in the tally. If you just include Sun-like stars, then the peak occurs roughly around now, which would mean life on Earth could be rather typical, and arose at a pretty typical time. So this work doesn't answer the question of where life is out there as much as it raises an interesting question about the origin of life over time. Still, it’s fun to imagine that trillions of years from now an alien species might find remnants of a great intergalactic civilization they refer to as the first ones, never knowing that we called ourselves human. Brian Koberlein