First contact? Earth hit by mind-blowingly powerful radio burst every 10 seconds

BREAKING NEWS ALIENS HAVE BEEN DETECTED!
Read on below for full story.
Amazing video...


MYSTERIOUS RADIO...
pulses of radio energy more powerful than 10,000 suns picked up by astronomers have now been linked to a dwarf galaxy discovered more than three billion light years away.

Radio waves detect Aliens

Fast Radio Burst (FRB) are highly energetic but very short-lived bursts of radio waves lasting no more than a millisecond. The flickers of light, which were first discovered in 2007, last for a fraction of a second but during that time release more energy that the sun will radiate in 10,000 years.

So far 17 more FRBs have been identified - and scientists estimate one of these bursts occurs somewhere in the sky every 10 second. But a recent study has been able to locate one of the bursts to within a dwarf galaxy billions of light years away - in what could be a sign of alien life.

Radio waves detected

So far 17 more FRBs have been identified

First spotted in 2012 by astronomers at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, the bright, flickering light has recurred repeatedly over the last four years. And scientists can now reveal its exact position in the sky after honing in on the location following six months of studying the bursts. Dr Shriharsh Tendulkar, a member of the team from McGill University in Montreal, Canada, said: "Before we knew the distance to any FRBs, several proposed explanations for their origins said they could be coming from within or near our own Milky Way galaxy. “We now have ruled out those explanations, at least for this FRB."

Using the Very Large Array (VLA), a multi-antenna radio telescope operated by the US National Science Foundation, they were able to pinpoint exactly where FRB 121102 was coming from. And the spot happened to coincide with that of a faint dwarf galaxy more than three billion light years from Earth. Further investigations revealed the two emission sources could not be more than 100 light years apart, and are likely to come from the same source.

Dr Benito Marcote, from the Joint Institute for Very Long Baseline Interferometry in Dwingeloo, the Netherlands, said: "We think that the bursts and the continuous source are likely to be either the same object or that they are somehow physically associated with each other." But what exactly produced the burst remains unknown. Experts suggest it could have been caused by a super-dense neutron star or possibly a "magnetar", a neutron star with a very powerful magnetic field.

Telescope

A a recent study has been able to locate one of the bursts to within a dwarf galax

But it has also been suggested the source could be jets of material shooting out from the rim of a supermassive black hole. Co-author Dr Shami Chatterjee, from Cornell University in the US, said: "Finding the host galaxy of this FRB, and its distance, is a big step forward, but we still have much more to do before we fully understand what these things are." The research was presented at the American Astronomical Society's annual meeting in Grapevine, Texas.

I have just found 3 Crocodile skeletons in an official NASA image

I couldn't believe my luck when I found this NASA image! I took one look at it and thought nah, there's nothing in this image? But then down in the bottom right I thought WTF? Is that a Crocodile? Is it an Alligator? I didn't think anything of it so I left it at that? I still had the tab open later on and I thought I'de just get an image analyser from the app store and take a closer look? UFO Sightings Footage is one of our channels.

Crocodile bones found on Mars

Then I hit what I thought was a jackpot! A Crocodile skeleton? Then it went something like this "no way"! Another 2 Crocodile skeletons that seem to be looking at the bigger one in the far right bottom? This is what I call a fluke of nature, or just a fluke that I was looking at that particular time? Either way, I have stumbled upon something amazing here.

The full Mars image taken by Curiosity Rover on 17th December 2015. Click to view.

Bottom right is where the first Crocodile bones are

The Crocodile skeletons seem to be "stuck" in mid motion? Like a statue or something? Why do they look like that? Then I started to think of a few scenarios to do with what could of caused a mid-flow statue? A nuclear bomb? Atomic bomb? A meteorite blast? A Martian planet wide mutual destruction? Like the old photos from Japan after the US dropped the nuclear bomb?

The shadows of the Japanese people were literally burned in to concrete and people's bodies were caught in mid-flow which then looked like a statue? That's all I can come up with at this time as to what caused this "mid-flow" statue look on these so-called skeletons? Can you think of another theory as to why these look like they do? Is it purely a natural coincidence that they look the way they do?

Here's some other bones that have found on Mars;

I'm totally convinced that these are skeletons because I've seen other official images from NASA's archives that show bones, skulls, animals etc. There's the dinosaur head with jaw and teeth. Multiple skulls and numerous bones scattered across the surface of Mars! It is proof of life and I even found a piece of pottery on Mars in official image, of which you'll see below in this awesome image. I circled the pottery in red.

Face on a piece of pottery

20 Plus UFOs Caught Leaving Our Moon A Sight to Behold Historic Moment

This is a huge moment for conspiracy theorists because today, we step out of maybe's-ville and in to definite's-ville! I have spotted, counted at least 20+ (plus) UFOs leaving the lunars surface and making haste in to the black ink, void of space! How many can you count? It's a turkey shoot but for Aliens in UFOs? I'm speechless!



So I'm searching through books, internet and newspapers looking for a thoroughly good, epic UFO story and wall-ah, there's this amazing obscure post about a fleet of UFOs seen leaving the moon? So as always I'm a bit skeptic about it? It's my first and best tool in this whole UFO investigation.

Skeptic, it has gotten me through some embarrassing moments I'll tell you? Things that looked amazing and a sure bet, but have turned out to be photo-shopped or a flying saucer which was a drone decked out with lights etc. I always have my wits around me as much as I can? This looks real, it could be real, but then again it could be innocent camera flare, grainy images or a complete hoax?

My guts tell me this is real because I have seen other videos that are just like this one? That's the exciting moment is when you can link videos and images then see a bigger picture emerging. That's when the feelings start to get intense inside and a urge to share it with others, that's why I set up this very website.

I want you to tell me what you think about this video, hoax or history? I'm of the opinion that this is a real event that really took place! I've not done an image or video analysis because I am not that tech savvy but I am sure someone will get to that point and reveal stuff we cannot see? Until then really I should reserve my opinion but this is telling me it is real!

For one, they are in formation and going at the same speed. For two, they seem to be of the same size and the same colours. Then there number three, I have seen similar videos and images of these before! That's not enough for a definitive answer but it helps "me" make a decision and hopefully you, that this is a real event? Here's some other images I have seen that is similar in nature;

Perfect example of UFOs caught flying over the moon

Voyager style UFO seen over the moon

UFO over the moon

UFO flying over the lunar surface

UFO flying around the moon

This is what a newspaper had to say about this amazing, historic event;

Astonishing video showing 'UFO fleet leaving the moon' prompts claims of alien base.

Alien conspiracy theorists (that would me then) are convinced it is evidence of extraterrestrials living on our moon and miming it, but sceptics claim it is nothing more than a stunning optical illusion. The video was first uploaded to YouTube by Geri Vigil under the title "Large Group of UFOs Leaving the Moon". It shows a number of blobs appearing to move away from the bottom-left area of the moon, but there is also a lot of shimmering seen in that area. However, it has still led to claims from viewers of a possible alien departure.

One posted: "Those aliens were rooting for the establishment of the New World Order, but since Donald Trump won the elections, they lost hope and decided to just go home... that's what we are seeing in this video." Talia Adagio1 added: "I see the same effect in reverse on the right side, they look like they are landing instead." Even former hacker Gary McKinnon, who was nearly extradited to the US for hacking into the computers of NASA and US military to try to find information about UFOs, joined the debate. He was not convinced it showed alien activity, and believes it was an optical illusion. He wrote: "There's a lot of footage of objects leaving the moon, as more people get better telescopes it's being observed more often.

"This looks like far too many though, I think it must be visual artifacting." Photographer John Biondo agreed, posting: "UFO's are NOT what you're seeing. It is a phenomenon seen anytime you look at the Moon's edge. "I have lots of telescope time. You see this all the time, it's called Chromatic Aberration. (Google it) You see it more when the lens is out of focus as well, such as in this video." And another viewer posted: "This is just an optical illusion. It happens when the air's humidity is high and the light from the moon gets distorted or multiple light sources/bright objects in the distance on the earth gets reflected. "It's some kind of mirage, but definitely not UFOs leaving the moon that's for sure. Amazing video anyway!" UFO blogger Scott C Waring, picked up on the footage, adding to the claims it showed alien UFOs.

He said: "It's been known by a lot of astronomers that if the edge of the moon is observed well enough, you will see fleets of UFOs in orbit move around the moons horizon. "These objects are clearly in orbit around the moon and may be there to protect the moon from humanity. "We haven't been back to the moon since the Apollo missions, and there is no intention of going back. "Many Apollo astronauts have stated that they saw UFOs on and near the moon, so maybe these objects are a form of protection from future Apollo missions landing on the moon. "It may be owned by a species that's not so friendly about sharing."

March to the beat of your own drum, don't march to anyone else's drum! Be yourself and be true to yourself. If you think a little bit wacky then so be it? It is you my friend that makes me want to live in this world, because you keep it interesting and very bright. Thank you for taking time to read my post, you rock.
Tim Lewis.

Here's another UFO Mother-ship caught flying over the moon on the same day;

Ancient Aliens Bodies Found In A Peru Cave In The Desert

The supposed skull and a small, allegedly mummified humanoid-like body found near it, will allegedly be sent for DNA tests. There are suspicions the objects could be an elaborate hoax, as non exact location of the find or details of who discovered them has been released. Author Brian Forester features in a video released on YouTube and his website, claiming he intends having tests carried out on the finds.

He said in the video: "I don't know what to say and look forward to the possibility of seeing more specimens. "The head appears to be made of bone with skin over the top. It has two eyes, but the eyes are nothing like a human, it is more amphibian or reptilian than human? "The mouth seems to be so tiny that it does not even appear to be for feeding. "It is a very mysterious thing and I can't imagine how those two specimens could be fake."

I found a lot of images of these Peruvian Aliens and I think this is a 98% real finding. The Aliens pictured below all have some similar characteristics and look very similar. I wonder if there was a race of small beings or a whole host of races that once existed on the earth at one stage in the past?

Each image is amazing for it is a 50 - 50 chance that it could be a Alien or an hoax? It doesn't matter if one or two turn out to be a complete fake because the numbers look good and say that it could one day be found to be real? Or at least I hope that one day we will find a real Alien, alive!

If we can't find the person whom found these "creatures" then the next best thing is a DNA test, a survey maybe of the place it was rumoured to have been found depending on the DNA results? This would rule out or rule in the Alien theory? I personally look at it as a maybe, but that's because I want it to be real, I understand that this is a weakness of mine, but yet I am still able to accept findings either way it swings?

Peru Alien body

Alien face

The skull base of the Peru Alien

Another couple of Alien bodies

Now I will show you other small Alien bodies found around the world that all look similar in some ways or another? Theres these;

These Alien bodies, skulls are very different to what should be in nature according to our understandings? Look at these creatures below and you tell me (if real) what the hell are they? Are they from earth or are they from a more exotic place in the sky? Space is vast and has a unique way of creating life, we know this because of the types of life here on earth? Theres loads of life, elephants, lions, cats, dogs all different in their own way, but all born on this planet!

To me, this is hope. It is hope that there is life in outer space. If I am right like millions of other humans then it is just a matter of time that we find (or already have) and we don't need NASA, JPL, etc to validate our beliefs, we don't need governments to say yes to the Alien question. I already know what the truth is and I already know we have a heavenly brother out there waiting to... meet us and say hey, whats up?

Are We Alone? Scientists Discuss The Search For Life And Odds Of E.T.

So you think that we are alone eh mon'Amie

Amazing SETI search for Aliens As more planets are discovered outside Earth's solar system, scientists must update estimations about the likelihood that life has formed somewhere other than Earth. Credit: ESO

SALT LAKE CITY — What are the odds that alien life exists elsewhere in the universe? At a major physics meeting, experts talked about updates to historic predictions about whether humans are alone in the cosmos. 

In 1961, astronomer Frank Drake wrote an equation to quantify the likelihood of finding a technologically advanced civilization elsewhere in the universe. The so-called Drake equation took into account factors such as the fraction of stars with planets around them and the fraction of those planets that would be hospitable to life.

In the years since 1961, scientists have updated the values in the Drake equation to incorporate newly acquired scientific information. For example, when Drake wrote his equation, scientists didn't know for sure if stars other than the sun had planets around them; now, researchers have evidence that most stars host planets. But science wasn't the only thing that influenced Drake — even current events factor into his calculation. [The Father of SETI: Q&A with Astronomer Frank Drake]

A lonely planet? At the heart of the search for life elsewhere in the universe is the question "Is Earth unique?" said Matthew Stanley, a science historian at New York University. Stanley discussed the history of humanity's evolving view of its place in the cosmos at the American Physical Society April Meeting on Saturday (April 16), in a session focused on recent discoveries in planetary science.

Humans once thought that the Earth was not only unique, but at the centre of the entire universe, Stanley said. Scientific investigations eventually showed that our planet is not even at the centre of its own solar system — it is one of seven other planets and many smaller bodies orbiting the sun.



On the other hand, in the last 20 years, scientists have discovered thousands of planets around other stars, and most of those planets are not like Earth (they're big and gaseous, like Jupiter). And most solar systems are not like Earth's solar system (big planets orbit close to their parent star, whereas in Earth's solar system, the large planets orbit further out).

Does this suggest that Earth is unique? Stanley said that currently, this question is difficult to answer, because telescopes that search for exoplanets have a selection bias toward large, gas giant planets that orbit very close to their parent stars. With current technologies, these types of planets are easier to detect. With that in mind, scientists are still trying to estimate how many rocky and Earth-like planets are out there.

By one estimation, for every grain of sand on Earth, there could be as many as 10 Earth-like planets in the universe. That's according to Peter Behroozi, a Hubble fellow at the University of California, Berkeley, who presented during the same session as Stanley. (Of course, it is important to remember that the universe is a very big place, and at the moment scientists can search for life only on planets within the Milky Way galaxy.)

An artist's concept of planet system Kepler-47. As scientists learn more about the cosmos, estimations of the likelihood that life exists beyond Earth are changing. Credit: NASA

Behroozi is working to link galaxy formation with planet formation. In a paper published in 2015 in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Socity, he and his co-author showed that larger galaxies produce a greater number of Earth-like planets than do smaller galaxies such as, for example, the Milky Way. But because there are many more Milky Way-size galaxies in the universe, that's where most Earth-like planets in the universe should be found.

Thus, Earth's location in a Milky Way-size galaxy is not unique. This work not only helps scientists make estimations about how many planets are currently in the universe, but how many will form, assuming the universe continues to grow and evolve in the same way it has in the recent past. In the 2015 paper, Behroozi and his colleague look far ahead into the future and estimate that "the universe will form over 10 times more planets than currently exist." The paper summary goes on to say that there is "at least a 92 percent chance that we are not the only civilization the universe will ever have."



A historical perspective During his talk, Stanley re-traced the history of humanity's search for life beyond Earth, and showed how people are influenced by their own times and experiences when trying to predict what lies beyond this planet. William Herschel, an extremely influential 18th century astronomer, believed that intelligent beings lived on the sun. In the 19th century, mainstream astronomers thought they saw artificial canals built by intelligent creatures on Mars and Venus. Observations of those two planets and the sun by space-based probes have disproved those ideas, but new research has also given rise to updated ideas about how and where life could exist elsewhere in the universe.

For example, Stanley said, in the last 40 years, scientists have adopted a broader view of the conditions under which life can exist. So-called extremophiles are organisms that live in environments that were previously thought inhospitable, like at the bottom of the ocean, under the ice in Antarctica and in areas that receive high doses of radiation.

Stanley said many aspects of the Drake equation need updating not only with new scientific evidence, but also with new perspectives. (It should be noted that there are scientists and writers who have dedicated entire books to updating Drake's predictions.) Drake's equation, for example includes the variable L, which stands for "the length of time such [technologically advanced] civilizations release detectable signals into space," according to the SETI Institute.

When Drake wrote his equation in the 1960s, the value for L was thought of as the time between when a civilization discovered atomic energy and when that society managed to destroy itself through nuclear annihilation, Stanley said. "That's a totally reasonable way to think about the length of time of a civilization at the height of the Cold War," he said. "But there's been recent work … arguing that we shouldn't think about 'L' in terms of nuclear war. We should think about it in terms of environmental destruction. … That is, it's the time between the discovery of a steam engine and catastrophic climate change."

The equation also includes the variable fc, which represents the fraction of alien civilizations that "develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence" (such as radio communications or television broadcast signals sprayed out into space), the SETI Institute said. Today, however, many of Earth's communications no longer leak out into space, but are instead passed neatly between ground sources and satellites. There are still projects searching for leaky alien communications, and some scientists have proposed that humans should look for focused, laser-based systems used by alien civilizations to communicate between multiple planets or even multiple star systems. But Stanley's larger point is that to some extent, humanity can only look for alien civilizations that bear some resemblance to our own.

Today, the search for life on other planets is largely focused on telescopes that can study the atmospheres of distant planets and look for signs of biological processes. For example, high levels of methane (produced by many living organisms on Earth) or oxygen in a planet's atmosphere could be due to biological activity. And one day, researchers may be able to search for artificially created atmospheric elements. "So even if we bomb ourselves back to the Renaissance or the Stone Age, the evidence that a civilization once existed on our planet [would not be] erased," Behroozi told Space.com.

The composition of a planet's atmosphere could even reveal how an intelligent civilization that once lived managed to kill itself, Stanley said. It may be impossible for humans to be purely objective in their speculation about life the universe, Stanley said. He added that he thinks personal bias and human experiences will always infuse science, but that those things can also help lead to successes in science. Having different perspectives helps people look at things in new ways, which can lead to breakthroughs, he said.

That's why, he said, it's actually a good idea for scientists to "talk to people outside your field … listen to marginal people. Get a diversity of people, people from different backgrounds, different genders [and] different kinds of cultures. "I think it's actually helpful to embrace the fact that this is always how science is done," he said. "And to accept that everybody's different, everybody has weird ideas, and that's actually a source of strength rather than weakness."

The Anunaki, Anunna, Anunnaku, Ananaki Deity Facts

Anunnaki King's in Deep Sleep Stasis Chamber;

Ancient Aliens: 

• “In the ancient texts of Sumeria we have descriptions of these being descending from the sky called the Annunaki. The term Annunaki means ‘those who from the heavens came.” This is entirely wrong. The word Annunaki means “princely seed” or “princely blood”. The idea is that the Annunaki were direct creations of Anu, who was regarded as the father and king of the gods. As we will see, this is the main idea associated with the Annunaki in the minds of Sumerian's, that is that they were directly created by Anu, and so it makes sense that even their name reflects this idea, that is that they were the offspring of the prince. “The term itself means ‘of royal seed’ or ‘princely seed’ because the anunnaki were considered the offspring of Anu or An – the great God of heaven. 

Anunnaki

The annunaki were also the offspring of An and his consort “ki“ of heaven and earth. [There was] this divine coupling [in] the way the Mesopotamians conceived their pantheon.” So if the term Annunaki means princely seed or offspring of the prince, how is it that Ancient Aliens says that the word for Annunaki means those who from heavens to earth came? The short answer is that everything Ancient Aliens says about the Annunaki comes from a man named Zecharia Sitchin. Sitchin wrote many books claiming that the Annunaki were really aliens. Unfortunately, at the time that he wrote this in the 70’s, there weren’t many ways for ordinary people to see if what he was saying is true or not. To put it simply Sitchin’s translation of the word Annunaki is wrong. Michael Heiser:

“You’ll often read, especially in the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, that the annunaki means something like ‘they who from heaven came’ or some other description that makes them sound like aliens or extra-terrestrials. There isn’t a source on the planet by any Sumerian scholar that would agree with that definition. It’s not a difficult term. I personally don’t think that Sitchin knew Sumerian at all because if you’re going to get a term associated with a very group of important deities wrong, I have to wonder what else you’re going to get wrong.” Sitchin claimed to be an expert on Sumerian writings, yet we can now see that he didn’t seem to even understand the basic grammar and vocabulary rules of the Sumerian language.v Several real scholars challenged him on his translations, and on his lack of any academic credentials in the field, pointing out that there is no record of Sitchin having anything but a journalism degree: One such scholar is Michael Heiser.

“To this day I haven’t been able to find, nor have other people of whom I’ve asked help – people who liked Sitchin – any credentials of him knowing any of the languages or him being credentialed in any way in ancient near-eastern studies.” As we progress and look into some of the specifics of Sitchin’s views – articulated by Ancient Aliens – I think you will see that determining the truth about this difficult subject is not out of the hands of the common person:

Conspiracy theorists claim the world will end next month... Again!

Okay, so the last time a 'global apocalypse' was predicted by conspiracy theorists, it didn't happen. But much like all of your ex-boyfriends, this time they swear it's going to be different.

A new doomsday theory suggests that the world may be ending in September after it collides with a hidden planet, called "Nibiru" or "Planet X," which is currently hurtling through our solar system.

In a video posted on YouTube, the masterminds behind conspiracy channel Nibiru Planet X 2016 claims to have captured footage of Nibiru in its path towards Earth. "It's happening now, folks," the video warns. "You just have to pay attention."
Click this video for more info...

Of course, the man behind the video warns naysayers against thinking his footage of Nibiru is just a mere lens flare. "Save your comments for another time," he says, "because this is a stationary object right next to the moon. There is no doubt about it." Actually, after he mentions it, a lens flare does seem like a pretty logical explanation to our untrained eyes.

Of course, this isn't the only video of its kind -- here's another video that claims that the world's scientists and governments have been covering up this impending apocalypse since 1997, when Earth began "showing us signals about NIBIRU PLANET-X approach (sic)."

On the bright side, if conspiracy theorists keep predicting the end of the world, maybe they'll get it right someday -- and think about what a rewarding 'told you so' that will be.

Until then, just keep trying, buddies.